Jackson Brumley, et al v. Albert Brumley & Sons, Inc., et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's introduction of the 1977 conversation into evidence is AFFIRMED, its exclusion of the Stubblefield and Malone articles is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Damon J. Keith, Boyce F. Martin , Jr. (AUTHORING), and R. Guy Cole , Jr., Circuit Judges.

Case: 12-5386

Document: 006111786044

Filed: 08/15/2013

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-5386
JACKSON S. BRUMLEY; ALBERT E. BRUMLEY,
JR.; THOMAS R. BRUMLEY; BILLY J. PACKRUS;
W.J. BRUMLEY; KRISTI BRUMLEY LAXTON;
MARK BRUMLEY; KERI BRUMLEY PILCHER,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,

FILED
Aug 15, 2013
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

v.
ALBERT E. BRUMLEY & SONS, INC.;
INTEGRATED COPYRIGHT GROUP, INC;
ROBERT B. BRUMLEY,
Defendants - Appellants.
Before: KEITH, MARTIN, and COLE, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s introduction
of the 1977 conversation into evidence is AFFIRMED, its exclusion of the Stubblefield and
Malone articles is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent
with the opinion of this court.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk