Jackson Brumley, et al v. Albert Brumley & Sons, Inc., et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's introduction of the 1977 conversation into evidence is AFFIRMED, its exclusion of the Stubblefield and Malone articles is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Damon J. Keith, Boyce F. Martin , Jr. (AUTHORING), and R. Guy Cole , Jr., Circuit Judges.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
JACKSON S. BRUMLEY; ALBERT E. BRUMLEY,
JR.; THOMAS R. BRUMLEY; BILLY J. PACKRUS;
W.J. BRUMLEY; KRISTI BRUMLEY LAXTON;
MARK BRUMLEY; KERI BRUMLEY PILCHER,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
Aug 15, 2013
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
ALBERT E. BRUMLEY & SONS, INC.;
INTEGRATED COPYRIGHT GROUP, INC;
ROBERT B. BRUMLEY,
Defendants - Appellants.
Before: KEITH, MARTIN, and COLE, Circuit Judges.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s introduction
of the 1977 conversation into evidence is AFFIRMED, its exclusion of the Stubblefield and
Malone articles is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent
with the opinion of this court.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?