Appalachian Land Company v. EQT Production Company

Filing

Per Curiam OPINION filed: In view of the decision by the Kentucky Supreme Court, we must REVERSE the judgment of the district court in EQT s favor and REMAND the case for further proceedings consistent with the state court s holding. Decision not for publication. Martha Craig Daughtrey, Circuit Judge; Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judge.

Download PDF

Case: 12-5589 Document: 60-1 Filed: 10/27/2015 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: October 27, 2015 Mr. John C. Whitfield Whitfield Bryson & Mason 19 N. Main Street Madisonville, KY 42431 Re: Case No. 12-5589, Appalachian Land Company v. EQT Production Company Originating Case No. : 7:08-cv-00139 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Bryant L. Crutcher Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7013 cc: Mr. Robert R. Carr Ms. Keri E. Lucas Ms. Kimberly S. McCann Mr. Gregory L. Monge Mr. George E. Stigger Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?