Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison v. Banks, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's judgment affirming the bankruptcy court's orders is AFFIRMED. The parties' motions to supplement the record in 12-5875, and to either strike the reply or allow a sur-reply in 12-5875 and 12-5876 ([4841036-2] [4840964-2] [4844796-2] [4840964-3]) are DENIED. Decision for publication. Boyce F. Martin, Jr., Ralph B. Guy, Jr. (AUTHORING), and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges. [12-5874, 12-5875, 12-5876]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
May 24, 2013
In re: STEVE A. MCKENZIE,
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
GRANT, KONVALINKA & HARRISON,
RICHARD L. BANKS, ANDREW B. MORGAN,
and RICHARD BANKS & ASSOC., P.C. (12-5874);
STEVE A. MCKENZIE and C. KENNETH STILL
12-5874 & 12-5875); F. SCOTT LEROY, d/b/a
LeRoy & Bickerstaff, LEROY & BICKERSTAFF,
PLLC, and LEROY, HURST & BICKERSTAFF,
PLLC (12-5874 & 12-5876),
Before: MARTIN, GUY, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s judgment affirming
the bankruptcy court’s orders is AFFIRMED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?