Southern Rehabilitation Group, et al v. Sec HHS, et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's decision granting summary judgment to defendants on plaintiffs' federal and state law claims and on the 8,900 claims still in the administrative process is AFFIRMED, its decision granting summary judgment on plaintiffs' claims for interest is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Decision for publication. Danny J. Boggs and David W. McKeague (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; Sandra S. Beckwith, U.S. District Judge for the Sourthern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
Case: 12-5903
Document: 006111854462
Filed: 10/18/2013
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: October 18, 2013
Ms. Wynne du Mariau Caffey
Mr. Robert S. Stone
Ramsey Elmore Stone & Caffey
5616 Kingston Pike, Suite 301
Knoxville, TN 37919-6301
Mr. Albert J. Harb
Hodges, Doughty & Carson
617 Main Street
Knoxville, TN 37902
Mr. Matthew C. Lonergan
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings
1600 Division Street, Suite 700
Nashville, TN 37203
Mr. Robert C. McConkey III
U.S. Attorney's Office
800 Market Street, Suite 211
Knoxville, TN 37902
Mr. David L. Steed
Cornelius & Collins
511 Union Street, Suite 1500
Nashville, TN 37219
Re: Case No. 12-5903, Southern Rehabilitation Group, et al v. Sec HHS, et al
Originating Case No. : 2:09-cv-00226
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Case: 12-5903
Document: 006111854462
Filed: 10/18/2013
Page: 2
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Ms. Debra Poplin
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?