Mickel Hoback v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee


OPINION filed : Because a panel opinion of this court would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we adopt the reasoning of the district court and AFFIRM on the basis of its opinion in all other respects, decision not for publication. Martha Craig Daughtrey, Julia Smith Gibbons (Authoring), and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 12-6171 Document: 006111916415 Filed: 12/20/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: December 20, 2013 Ms. Melinda J. Foster Mr. Phillip A. Noblett City Attorney's Office 100 E. Eleventh Street, Suite 200 Chattanooga, TN 37402 Mr. Phillip Calvin Lawrence Lawrence & Lawrence 200 E. Eighth Street Chattanooga, TN 37402 Mr. Michael E. Richardson Thornbury, Morgan & Richardson 732 Cherry Street Chattanooga, TN 37402 Re: Case No. 12-6171, Mickel Hoback v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee Originating Case No. : 1:10-cv-00074 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Robin L. Johnson Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7039 cc: Ms. Debra Poplin Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?