Mickel Hoback v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee

Filing

OPINION filed : Because a panel opinion of this court would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we adopt the reasoning of the district court and AFFIRM on the basis of its opinion in all other respects, decision not for publication. Martha Craig Daughtrey, Julia Smith Gibbons (Authoring), and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.

Case: 12-6171

Document: 006111916415

Filed: 12/20/2013

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: December 20, 2013
Ms. Melinda J. Foster
Mr. Phillip A. Noblett
City Attorney's Office
100 E. Eleventh Street, Suite 200
Chattanooga, TN 37402
Mr. Phillip Calvin Lawrence
Lawrence & Lawrence
200 E. Eighth Street
Chattanooga, TN 37402
Mr. Michael E. Richardson
Thornbury, Morgan & Richardson
732 Cherry Street
Chattanooga, TN 37402
Re: Case No. 12-6171, Mickel Hoback v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee
Originating Case No. : 1:10-cv-00074
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Robin L. Johnson
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7039
cc: Ms. Debra Poplin
Enclosure
Mandate to issue