Robert Cleveland, Jr. v. Frontstream DTI
Per Curiam OPINION filed : de novo review shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that Frontstream was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and we accordingly AFFIRM the distrct court's judgment, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges and The Honorable Sandra S. Beckwith, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Tel. (513) 564-7000
Filed: July 29, 2013
Mr. Daniel Devine
200 S. Andrews Avenue, Suite 100
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Mr. John J. Park
Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis
511 Union Street, Suite 2700
Nashville, TN 37219
Re: Case No. 12-6281, Robert Cleveland, Jr. v. Frontstream DTI
Originating Case No. : 3:12-cv-00275
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
s/Robin L. Johnson
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7039
cc: Mr. Keith Throckmorton
Mandate to issue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?