Robert Cleveland, Jr. v. Frontstream DTI

Filing

Per Curiam OPINION filed : de novo review shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that Frontstream was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and we accordingly AFFIRM the distrct court's judgment, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges and The Honorable Sandra S. Beckwith, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Case: 12-6281

Document: 006111767184

Filed: 07/29/2013

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: July 29, 2013

Mr. Daniel Devine
Santucci Priore
200 S. Andrews Avenue, Suite 100
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Mr. John J. Park
Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis
511 Union Street, Suite 2700
Nashville, TN 37219
Re: Case No. 12-6281, Robert Cleveland, Jr. v. Frontstream DTI
Originating Case No. : 3:12-cv-00275
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Robin L. Johnson
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7039
cc: Mr. Keith Throckmorton
Enclosure
Mandate to issue