Robert Cleveland, Jr. v. Frontstream DTI


Per Curiam OPINION filed : de novo review shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that Frontstream was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and we accordingly AFFIRM the distrct court's judgment, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges and The Honorable Sandra S. Beckwith, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 12-6281 Document: 006111767184 Filed: 07/29/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: July 29, 2013 Mr. Daniel Devine Santucci Priore 200 S. Andrews Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Mr. John J. Park Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis 511 Union Street, Suite 2700 Nashville, TN 37219 Re: Case No. 12-6281, Robert Cleveland, Jr. v. Frontstream DTI Originating Case No. : 3:12-cv-00275 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Robin L. Johnson Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7039 cc: Mr. Keith Throckmorton Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?