James Rogers, et al v. Sheriff Nelson O'Donnell, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The award of summary judgment in favor of the Smith defendants on all of plaintiffs claims against them and the court s denial of defendants motion for attorneys fees are AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr., David W. McKeague (AUTHORING), and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges. [12-6335, 12-6336]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
JAMES J. ROGERS,
Dec 16, 2013
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
GARRY MURPHY and BRIAN HENSLEY,
SHERIFF NELSON O’DONNELL, et al.,
JENNIFER HALL SMITH and DAVID W. SMITH,
Before: SILER, McKEAGUE, and WHITE, Circuit Judges.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, and for the reasons more fully set forth in the Court’s
opinion of even date, it is ORDERED that the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the
Smith defendants on all of plaintiffs’ claims against them is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
that the district court’s denial of defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees is AFFIRMED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?