James Rogers, et al v. Sheriff Nelson O'Donnell, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The award of summary judgment in favor of the Smith defendants on all of plaintiffs claims against them and the court s denial of defendants motion for attorneys fees are AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr., David W. McKeague (AUTHORING), and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges. [12-6335, 12-6336]

Download PDF
Case: 12-6335 Document: 006111909796 Filed: 12/16/2013 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Nos. 12-6335/6336 FILED JAMES J. ROGERS, Plaintiff, Dec 16, 2013 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk GARRY MURPHY and BRIAN HENSLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. SHERIFF NELSON O’DONNELL, et al., Defendants, JENNIFER HALL SMITH and DAVID W. SMITH, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Before: SILER, McKEAGUE, and WHITE, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, and for the reasons more fully set forth in the Court’s opinion of even date, it is ORDERED that the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Smith defendants on all of plaintiffs’ claims against them is AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court’s denial of defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees is AFFIRMED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?