Steven Williams, Jr. v. Nick Ludwick
Per Curiam OPINION filed : AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Ralph B. Guy , Jr., Julia Smith Gibbons, and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judges.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 14a0010n.06
Case No. 13-1195
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN WILLIAMS, JR.,
NICK J. LUDWICK,
Jan 09, 2014
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
Before: GUY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. Petitioner, Steven Williams, appeals the district court’s denial of his
petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 concerning his claim that the
state court unreasonably applied federal law to his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
Because the district court issued a thorough written opinion which correctly stated the governing
law and facts of the case, and because issuance of a full opinion would be both duplicative and
serve no jurisprudential purpose, we AFFIRM the judgment on the basis of the district court’s
opinion entered on January 15, 2013. Williams v. Ludwick, No. 09-13558, 2013 WL 153321
(E.D. Mich. Jan. 15, 2013).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?