USA v. Frederick Sutton

Filing

Per Curiam OPINION filed. The amended judgment of the district court entered on July 16, 2013, is VACATED. Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter a second amended judgment after an appeal to this court had been taken, we DISMISS the appeal docketed as case number 13-2094. Decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Circuit Judge; John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge and Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge. [13-2022, 13-2094]

Case: 13-2022

Document: 28-2

Filed: 08/13/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: August 13, 2014

Mr. Daniel Y. Mekaru
Office of the U.S. Attorney
330 Ionia Avenue, N.W.
P.O. Box 208
Grand Rapids, MI 49501
Mr. Paul L. Nelson
Federal Public Defender's Office
Western District of Michigan
50 Louis Street, N.W.
Suite 300
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Re: Case No. 13-2022/13-2094, USA v. Frederick Sutton
Originating Case No. : 1:09-cr-00034-1
Dear Sir or Madam,
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Benjamin P. Alexander
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7021
cc: Ms. Tracey Cordes
Enclosure
Mandate to issue