USA v. Frederick Sutton


Per Curiam OPINION filed. The amended judgment of the district court entered on July 16, 2013, is VACATED. Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter a second amended judgment after an appeal to this court had been taken, we DISMISS the appeal docketed as case number 13-2094. Decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Circuit Judge; John M. Rogers, Circuit Judge and Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge. [13-2022, 13-2094]

Download PDF
Case: 13-2022 Document: 28-2 Filed: 08/13/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: August 13, 2014 Mr. Daniel Y. Mekaru Office of the U.S. Attorney 330 Ionia Avenue, N.W. P.O. Box 208 Grand Rapids, MI 49501 Mr. Paul L. Nelson Federal Public Defender's Office Western District of Michigan 50 Louis Street, N.W. Suite 300 Grand Rapids, MI 49503 Re: Case No. 13-2022/13-2094, USA v. Frederick Sutton Originating Case No. : 1:09-cr-00034-1 Dear Sir or Madam, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Benjamin P. Alexander Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7021 cc: Ms. Tracey Cordes Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?