Layla Daryiosh, et al v. Target Corporation


OPINION filed : For reasons stated in the district court's opinion, we AFFIRM, decision not for publication. Alice M. Batchelder, Chief Circuit Judge, authoring; Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge and Helene N. White, Circuit Judge.

Download PDF
Case: 13-2146 Document: 35-2 Filed: 05/16/2014 Page: 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0369n.06 FILED No. 13-2146 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LAYLA DARYIOSH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. BEFORE: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) May 16, 2014 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS and WHITE, Circuit Judges. ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge. In this diversity action, Appellant Layla Daryiosh alleges that she suffered multiple injuries when she slipped and fell on a puddle in Target’s store in Warren, Michigan. The district court granted Target’s motion for summary judgment due to insufficient evidence of notice to support Daryiosh’s claim of negligence. After carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, and the parties’ briefs, we are convinced that the district court did not err in its conclusions. The district court’s opinion carefully and correctly sets out the law governing the issues raised and clearly articulates the reasons underlying its decision. Thus, issuance of a full written opinion by this court would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?