Layla Daryiosh, et al v. Target Corporation

Filing

OPINION filed : For reasons stated in the district court's opinion, we AFFIRM, decision not for publication. Alice M. Batchelder, Chief Circuit Judge, authoring; Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge and Helene N. White, Circuit Judge.

Case: 13-2146

Document: 35-2

Filed: 05/16/2014

Page: 1

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
File Name: 14a0369n.06

FILED

No. 13-2146
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
LAYLA DARYIOSH, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.

BEFORE:

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

May 16, 2014
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS and WHITE, Circuit Judges.

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge. In this diversity action, Appellant Layla
Daryiosh alleges that she suffered multiple injuries when she slipped and fell on a puddle in
Target’s store in Warren, Michigan. The district court granted Target’s motion for summary
judgment due to insufficient evidence of notice to support Daryiosh’s claim of negligence. After
carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, and the parties’ briefs, we are convinced that
the district court did not err in its conclusions. The district court’s opinion carefully and
correctly sets out the law governing the issues raised and clearly articulates the reasons
underlying its decision. Thus, issuance of a full written opinion by this court would serve no
useful purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM.