W.J. O'Neil Company v. Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s orders are REVERSED, the judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for sanctions [5099231-2] filed by Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson & Abbott, Inc., is DENIED. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole, Jr., Chief Judge (AUTHORING); Danny J. Boggs and David W. McKeague (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 13-2320 Document: 47-1 Filed: 08/28/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: August 28, 2014 Mr. Jeffrey Charles Gerish Mr. Scott H. Sirich Plunkett Cooney 38505 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2000 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 Ms. Michelle A Thomas Thomas, DeGrood, Witenoff & Hoffman 400 Galleria Officentre, Suite 550 Southfield, MI 48034 Mr. David M. Zack McAlpine & Associates 3201 University Drive, Suite 100 Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Re: Case No. 13-2320, W.J. O'Neil Company v. Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson, et al Originating Case No. : 2:11-cv-12020 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?