Andrew Shirvell v. Deborah Gordon
Filing
OPINION filed: For the above reasons, we AFFIRM the imposition of Rule 11 sanctions. We also find that Shirvell s appeal is frivolous, but that Rule 38 sanctions are not necessary. We therefore DENY Gordon s motion for Rule 38 sanctions. Decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Karen Nelson Moore, and Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.
<![CDATA[
Case: 13-2366
Document: 65-1
Filed: 02/02/2015
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: February 02, 2015
Ms. Sarah S. Prescott
Law Offices
33 Bloomfield Hills Parkway
Suite 220
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
Mr. Andrew L. Shirvell
P.O. Box 353701
Palm Coast, FL 32135
Re: Case No. 13-2366, Andrew Shirvell v. Deborah Gordon
Originating Case No. : 2:11-cv-14781
Dear Counsel and Mr. Shirvell:
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Amy E. Gigliotti
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012
cc: Mr. David J. Weaver
Enclosure
Mandate to issue
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
