Arlys Williams v. Target Corporation, et al

Filing

Per Curiam OPINION filed : The district court's judment is VACATED and we REMAND this case to the district court with instructions that it REMAND the case to Hartford's plan administrator so that the record may be developed in accordance with this opinion. Decision not for publication. Ralph B. Guy , Jr., Raymond M. Kethledge and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-2410

Document: 51-1

Filed: 09/04/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: September 04, 2014

Mr. Charles Gottlieb
Gottlieb & Goren
30150 Telegraph Road
Suite 249
Bingham Farms, MI 48025
Ms. Kimberly J. Ruppel
Dickinson Wright
2600 W. Big Beaver Road
Suite 300
Troy, MI 48084
Re: Case No. 13-2410, Arlys Williams v. Target Corporation, et al
Originating Case No. : 4:12-cv-11775
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Amy E. Gigliotti
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012
cc: Mr. David J. Weaver
Enclosure
Mandate to issue