Arlys Williams v. Target Corporation, et al


Per Curiam OPINION filed : The district court's judment is VACATED and we REMAND this case to the district court with instructions that it REMAND the case to Hartford's plan administrator so that the record may be developed in accordance with this opinion. Decision not for publication. Ralph B. Guy , Jr., Raymond M. Kethledge and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 13-2410 Document: 51-1 Filed: 09/04/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: September 04, 2014 Mr. Charles Gottlieb Gottlieb & Goren 30150 Telegraph Road Suite 249 Bingham Farms, MI 48025 Ms. Kimberly J. Ruppel Dickinson Wright 2600 W. Big Beaver Road Suite 300 Troy, MI 48084 Re: Case No. 13-2410, Arlys Williams v. Target Corporation, et al Originating Case No. : 4:12-cv-11775 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Amy E. Gigliotti Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012 cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?