Arthur Tyler v. Carl Anderson


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: Tyler s second or successive petition on the claim relating to Head is DENIED, and the district court s denial of Tyler s Rule 60(b) motion in relation to the jury-deliberation-instruction claim is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), John M. Rogers, and Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 13-4036 Document: 42-1 Filed: 04/15/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: April 15, 2014 Ms. Jillian S. Davis Ms. Lori Beth Riga Mr. Alan C. Rossman Ms. Vicki Ruth Adams Werneke Federal Public Defender's Office 1660 W. Second Street, Suite 750 Cleveland, OH 44113 Mr. Charles L. Wille Office of the Ohio Attorney General 150 E. Gay Street, 16th Floor Columbus, OH 43215 Re: Case No. 13-4036, Arthur Tyler v. Carl Anderson Originating Case No. : 1:96-cv-01881 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Geri M. Smith Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?