Arthur Tyler v. Carl Anderson
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: Tyler s second or successive petition on the claim relating to Head is DENIED, and the district court s denial of Tyler s Rule 60(b) motion in relation to the jury-deliberation-instruction claim is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), John M. Rogers, and Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judges.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Tel. (513) 564-7000
Filed: April 15, 2014
Ms. Jillian S. Davis
Ms. Lori Beth Riga
Mr. Alan C. Rossman
Ms. Vicki Ruth Adams Werneke
Federal Public Defender's Office
1660 W. Second Street, Suite 750
Cleveland, OH 44113
Mr. Charles L. Wille
Office of the Ohio Attorney General
150 E. Gay Street, 16th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
Re: Case No. 13-4036, Arthur Tyler v. Carl Anderson
Originating Case No. : 1:96-cv-01881
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
cc: Geri M. Smith
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?