Arthur Tyler v. Carl Anderson

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: Tyler s second or successive petition on the claim relating to Head is DENIED, and the district court s denial of Tyler s Rule 60(b) motion in relation to the jury-deliberation-instruction claim is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), John M. Rogers, and Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 13-4036 Document: 42-3 Filed: 04/15/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 13-4036 FILED ARTHUR TYLER, Petitioner - Appellant, Apr 15, 2014 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. CARL ANDERSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Before: GIBBONS, ROGERS, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that Tyler’s second or successive petition on the claim relating to Head is DENIED, and the district court’s denial of Tyler’s Rule 60(b) motion in relation to the jury-deliberation-instruction claim is AFFIRMED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?