Arthur Tyler v. Carl Anderson
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: Tyler s second or successive petition on the claim relating to Head is DENIED, and the district court s denial of Tyler s Rule 60(b) motion in relation to the jury-deliberation-instruction claim is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), John M. Rogers, and Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judges.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Petitioner - Appellant,
Apr 15, 2014
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
CARL ANDERSON, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Before: GIBBONS, ROGERS, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that Tyler’s second or successive
petition on the claim relating to Head is DENIED, and the district court’s denial of Tyler’s Rule
60(b) motion in relation to the jury-deliberation-instruction claim is AFFIRMED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?