Nadia Nathan v. The Ohio State University, et al

Filing

OPINION filed : Accordingly, for the reasons stated above and for the reasons thoroughly discussed in the district court's well-reasoned opinion, we AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment on Dr. Nathan's discrimination and retaliation claims. Decision not for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judge; David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge authoring, and David M. Lawson, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of MI.

Case: 13-4390

Document: 42-1

Filed: 08/21/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: August 21, 2014

Ms. Christina L. Corl
Crabbe, Brown & James
500 S. Front Street
Suite 1200
Columbus, OH 43215
Mr. Randolph H Freking
Freking & Betz
525 Vine Street
Sixth Floor
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Re: Case No. 13-4390, Nadia Nathan v. The Ohio State University, et al
Originating Case No. : 2:10-cv-00872
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Amy E. Gigliotti
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012
cc: Mr. John P. Hehman
Enclosure
Mandate to issue