Nadia Nathan v. The Ohio State University, et al


OPINION filed : Accordingly, for the reasons stated above and for the reasons thoroughly discussed in the district court's well-reasoned opinion, we AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment on Dr. Nathan's discrimination and retaliation claims. Decision not for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judge; David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge authoring, and David M. Lawson, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of MI.

Download PDF
Case: 13-4390 Document: 42-1 Filed: 08/21/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: August 21, 2014 Ms. Christina L. Corl Crabbe, Brown & James 500 S. Front Street Suite 1200 Columbus, OH 43215 Mr. Randolph H Freking Freking & Betz 525 Vine Street Sixth Floor Cincinnati, OH 45202 Re: Case No. 13-4390, Nadia Nathan v. The Ohio State University, et al Originating Case No. : 2:10-cv-00872 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Amy E. Gigliotti Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012 cc: Mr. John P. Hehman Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?