Marilyn Johnson, et al v. City of Memphi

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s immunity-based dismissal of plaintiffs negligence claim related to the 2000 action is AFFIRMED, the Title VII judgment invalidating the 2002 process is REVERSED thereby MOOTING the plaintiffs challenge to the district court s choice of remedies for the 2002 process. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court s fees award is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Richard F. Suhrheinrich, Julia Smith Gibbons, and Deborah L. Cook (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. [13-5452, 13-5454]

Download PDF
Case: 13-5452 Document: 65-1 Filed: 10/27/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: October 27, 2014 Mr. Louis P. Britt III Mr. Jameson Dylan King Mr. Joshua James Sudbury Ford & Harrison 150 Third Avenue, S. Suite 2010 Nashville, TN 37201 Mr. David M. Sullivan 4735 Spottswood, Suite 102 Memphis, TN 38117 Re: Case Nos. 13-5452/5454, Marilyn Johnson, et al v. City of Memphis Originating Case Nos. : 2:04-cv-02017; 2:04-cv-02013; 2:00-cv-02608 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled cases. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. Thomas M. Gould Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?