Marilyn Johnson, et al v. City of Memphi
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s immunity-based dismissal of plaintiffs negligence claim related to the 2000 action is AFFIRMED, the Title VII judgment invalidating the 2002 process is REVERSED thereby MOOTING the plaintiffs challenge to the district court s choice of remedies for the 2002 process. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court s fees award is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Richard F. Suhrheinrich, Julia Smith Gibbons, and Deborah L. Cook (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges. [13-5452, 13-5454]
Case: 13-5452
Document: 65-1
Filed: 10/27/2014
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: October 27, 2014
Mr. Louis P. Britt III
Mr. Jameson Dylan King
Mr. Joshua James Sudbury
Ford & Harrison
150 Third Avenue, S.
Suite 2010
Nashville, TN 37201
Mr. David M. Sullivan
4735 Spottswood, Suite 102
Memphis, TN 38117
Re: Case Nos. 13-5452/5454, Marilyn Johnson, et al v. City of Memphis
Originating Case Nos. : 2:04-cv-02017; 2:04-cv-02013; 2:00-cv-02608
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled cases.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Mr. Thomas M. Gould
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?