USA v. Frank Randolph
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court is REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Richard Allen Griffin and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judges; George C. Steeh (AUTHORING), Senior U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
Case: 13-5477
Document: 58-3
Filed: 07/24/2015
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-5477
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
FILED
Jul 24, 2015
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
v.
FRANK DWAYNE RANDOLPH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Before: GRIFFIN and STRANCH, Circuit Judges; STEEH, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district
court is REVERSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, and
REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this
court.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?