James Pierson v. Quad/Graphics Printing Corp., et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of QG is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), and Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judges.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Deborah S. Hunt
Tel. (513) 564-7000
Filed: April 18, 2014
Mr. Douglas B. Janney III
2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-200
Nashville, TN 37215
Ms. Laura A. Lindner
111 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 1000
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Re: Case No. 13-5784, James Pierson v. Quad/Graphics Printing Corp., et al
Originating Case No. : 3:11-cv-01126
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
cc: Mr. Keith Throckmorton
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?