James Pierson v. Quad/Graphics Printing Corp., et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of QG is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), and Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 13-5784 Document: 43-1 Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: April 18, 2014 Mr. Douglas B. Janney III Law Office 2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-200 Nashville, TN 37215 Ms. Laura A. Lindner Littler Mendelson 111 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 1000 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Re: Case No. 13-5784, James Pierson v. Quad/Graphics Printing Corp., et al Originating Case No. : 3:11-cv-01126 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. Keith Throckmorton Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?