James Pierson v. Quad/Graphics Printing Corp., et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of QG is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), and Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-5784

Document: 43-1

Filed: 04/18/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: April 18, 2014
Mr. Douglas B. Janney III
Law Office
2002 Richard Jones Road, Suite B-200
Nashville, TN 37215
Ms. Laura A. Lindner
Littler Mendelson
111 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 1000
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Re: Case No. 13-5784, James Pierson v. Quad/Graphics Printing Corp., et al
Originating Case No. : 3:11-cv-01126
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Mr. Keith Throckmorton
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.