Samuel Humphreys v. Bank of America, et al


OPINION filed : The district court's dismissal of the fraudulent inducement claim and any overlapping portion of the intentional misrepresentation claim is REVERSED. The judgment of the district court is otherwise AFFIRMED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Karen Nelson Moore and Deborah L. Cook (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; James S. Gwin, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 13-5793 Document: 006111960795 Filed: 02/11/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: February 11, 2014 Mr. Steven E. Barlow Mr. Webb Alexander Brewer Brewer & Barlow 1755 Kirby Parkway Suite 110 Memphis, TN 38120 Ms. Kelli Anne Burns McGuire Woods 201 N. Tryon Street, Suite 3000 Charlotte, NC 28202 Mr. Brian Christian Neal Stites & Harbison 401 Commerce Street, Suite 800 Nashville, TN 37219 Re: Case No. 13-5793, Samuel Humphreys v. Bank of America, et al Originating Case No. : 2:11-cv-02514 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Cathryn Lovely for Cheryl Borkowski Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7035 cc: Mr. Thomas M. Gould Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?