USA v. Courtney Noble
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court s denial of Noble s, Adkins s and Brooks s motions to suppress is REVERSED, all of the defendants convictions are VACATED, and the cases are REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING) and Raymond M. Kethledge (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges; Arthur J. Tarnow, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. [13-6056, 13-6057, 13-6156]
Case: 13-6056
Document: 40-3
Filed: 08/08/2014
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Nos. 13-6056/6057/6156
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
FILED
Aug 08, 2014
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
v.
COURTNEY JUNIOR NOBLE (13-6056),
MARCUS JESSIE ADKINS (13-6057), and
DENA LYNN BROOKS (13-6156),
Defendants - Appellants.
Before: MOORE and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; TARNOW, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court. Cases 13-6056 and 136156 were argued by counsel, and case 13-6057 was submitted on the briefs without oral
argument.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s denial of
Noble’s, Adkins’s and Brooks’s motions to suppress is REVERSED, all of the defendants’
convictions are VACATED, and the cases are REMANDED to the district court for further
proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?