USA v. Courtney Noble

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court s denial of Noble s, Adkins s and Brooks s motions to suppress is REVERSED, all of the defendants convictions are VACATED, and the cases are REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING) and Raymond M. Kethledge (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges; Arthur J. Tarnow, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. [13-6056, 13-6057, 13-6156]

Download PDF
Case: 13-6056 Document: 40-3 Filed: 08/08/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Nos. 13-6056/6057/6156 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, FILED Aug 08, 2014 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. COURTNEY JUNIOR NOBLE (13-6056), MARCUS JESSIE ADKINS (13-6057), and DENA LYNN BROOKS (13-6156), Defendants - Appellants. Before: MOORE and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; TARNOW, District Judge. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court. Cases 13-6056 and 136156 were argued by counsel, and case 13-6057 was submitted on the briefs without oral argument. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s denial of Noble’s, Adkins’s and Brooks’s motions to suppress is REVERSED, all of the defendants’ convictions are VACATED, and the cases are REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?