In re: Dean Bradley, et al


OPINION filed: The Bankruptcy Court's holding that the Lender did not prove the elements of Section 523(a)(4) is AFFIRMED on alternative grounds: the Bankruptcy Court's ruling that the debt owed to the Lender is dischargeable is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for a determination of the amount of damages that Lender suffered due to Debtor's conversion pursuant to Section 523(a)(6) and fraudulent misrepresentations pursuant to Section 523(a)(2)(A) and for an entry of judgment in favor of Lender accordingly, decision fully precedential pursuant to local BAP rule 8013-1(b). George W. Emerson, Jr. (authoring judge), Guy R. Humphrey and C. Kathryn Preston, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 13-8010 Document: 33-2 Filed: 03/26/2014 Page: 1 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: March 26, 2014 Mr. Michael J. Moran Gibson & Lowry P.O. Box 535 Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44221 Mr. Joseph A. Wentzell Law Office 2812 Anthony Lane, S. Suite 200 Saint Anthony, MN 55418 Re: Case No. 13-8010, In re: Dean Bradley, et al Originating Case No. : 10-55621 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this appeal. Sincerely yours, s/Paula Moore Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7055 Enclosure

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?