In re: Dean Bradley, et al

Filing

OPINION filed: The Bankruptcy Court's holding that the Lender did not prove the elements of Section 523(a)(4) is AFFIRMED on alternative grounds: the Bankruptcy Court's ruling that the debt owed to the Lender is dischargeable is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for a determination of the amount of damages that Lender suffered due to Debtor's conversion pursuant to Section 523(a)(6) and fraudulent misrepresentations pursuant to Section 523(a)(2)(A) and for an entry of judgment in favor of Lender accordingly, decision fully precedential pursuant to local BAP rule 8013-1(b). George W. Emerson, Jr. (authoring judge), Guy R. Humphrey and C. Kathryn Preston, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judges.

Case: 13-8010

Document: 33-2

Filed: 03/26/2014

Page: 1

BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL
OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: March 26, 2014

Mr. Michael J. Moran
Gibson & Lowry
P.O. Box 535
Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44221
Mr. Joseph A. Wentzell
Law Office
2812 Anthony Lane, S.
Suite 200
Saint Anthony, MN 55418
Re: Case No. 13-8010, In re: Dean Bradley, et al
Originating Case No. : 10-55621
Dear Counsel,
The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this appeal.
Sincerely yours,
s/Paula Moore
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7055
Enclosure