In re: Settlement Facility Dow
Filing
OPINION filed: We REVERSE the district court s judgment with respect to its rulings that (1) adequate assurance is the proper standard for assessing the availability of funds under SFA 7.03(a) and (2) that the SFA grants it the discretion to ignore otherwise competent reports and testimony challenging ARPC s methodologies, and we REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge (AUTHORING); Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judge and Gordon J. Quist, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
<![CDATA[
Case: 14-1090
Document: 44-1
Filed: 01/27/2015
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Filed: January 27, 2015
Ms. Deborah E. Greenspan
Dickstein Shapiro
1825 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Re: Case No. 14-1090, In re: Settlement Facility Dow
Originating Case No. : 2:00-mc-00005
Dear Sir or Madam,
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Bryant L. Crutcher
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7013
cc: Mr. John Donley
Mr. Kyle R. Dufrane
Mr. Ernest H. Hornsby
Mr. Timothy J. Jordan
Ms. Dianna Pendleton-Dominguez
Mr. Douglas Geoffrey Smith
Mr. James L. Stengel
Mr. David Henry Tennant
Mr. Jeffrey S. Trachtman
Mr. David J. Weaver
Ms. Laurie Strauch Weiss
Enclosure
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Case: 14-1090
Mandate to issue
Document: 44-1
Filed: 01/27/2015
Page: 2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
