In re: Settlement Facility Dow


OPINION filed: We REVERSE the district court s judgment with respect to its rulings that (1) adequate assurance is the proper standard for assessing the availability of funds under SFA 7.03(a) and (2) that the SFA grants it the discretion to ignore otherwise competent reports and testimony challenging ARPC s methodologies, and we REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge (AUTHORING); Deborah L. Cook, Circuit Judge and Gordon J. Quist, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 14-1090 Document: 44-1 Filed: 01/27/2015 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Filed: January 27, 2015 Ms. Deborah E. Greenspan Dickstein Shapiro 1825 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Re: Case No. 14-1090, In re: Settlement Facility Dow Originating Case No. : 2:00-mc-00005 Dear Sir or Madam, The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Bryant L. Crutcher Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7013 cc: Mr. John Donley Mr. Kyle R. Dufrane Mr. Ernest H. Hornsby Mr. Timothy J. Jordan Ms. Dianna Pendleton-Dominguez Mr. Douglas Geoffrey Smith Mr. James L. Stengel Mr. David Henry Tennant Mr. Jeffrey S. Trachtman Mr. David J. Weaver Ms. Laurie Strauch Weiss Enclosure Tel. (513) 564-7000 Case: 14-1090 Mandate to issue Document: 44-1 Filed: 01/27/2015 Page: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?