Mark Parsons, et al v. DOJ, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s dismissal for lack of standing is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for consideration of Defendants 12(b)(6) failure to state a claim arguments. Decision for publication. John M. Rogers and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges; and Edmund A. Sargus , Jr., Chief District Judge (AUTHORING), for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 14-1848 Document: 38-1 Filed: 09/17/2015 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Filed: September 17, 2015 Mr. Howard Hertz Hertz Schram 1760 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 300 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 Mr. Daniel S. Korobkin American Civil Liberties Union Of Michigan 2966 Woodward Avenue Detroit, MI 48201 Ms. Emily C. Palacios Miller Canfield 101 N. Main Street, Seventh Floor Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Ms. Lindsey Powell U. S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Room 7226 Washington, DC 20530 Mr. Michael S. Raab U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Appellate Staff 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 Mr. Saura James Sahu Miller Canfield 150 W. Jefferson Avenue, Suite 2500 Detroit, MI 48226 Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Case: 14-1848 Document: 38-1 Filed: 09/17/2015 Page: 2 Mr. Michael Jay Steinberg American Civil Liberties Union Of Michigan 2966 Woodward Avenue Detroit, MI 48201 Re: Case No. 14-1848, Mark Parsons, et al v. DOJ, et al Originating Case No. : 2:14-cv-10071 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?