Reza Yazdian v. Conmed Endoscopic Tech, Inc.

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed :The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings with respect to Yazdian's retaliation claim. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED with respect to the discrimination claim. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole, Jr., Chief Judge; Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING) and Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 14-3745 Document: 31-1 Filed: 07/14/2015 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: July 14, 2015 Mr. George M. Reul Jr. Freking & Betz 525 Vine Street, Sixth Floor Cincinnati, OH 45202 Ms. Laura L. Spring Cohen, Compagni, Beckman, Appler & Knoll 507 Plum Street, Suite 310 Syracuse, NY 13204 Mr. George M. Reul Jr. Freking & Betz 525 Vine Street, Sixth Floor Cincinnati, OH 45202 Re: Case No. 14-3745, Reza Yazdian v. ConMed Endoscopic Tech, Inc. Originating Case No. : 1:12-cv-00951 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. Richard W. Nagel Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?