Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : We REVERSE the trial court s standing determination; AFFIRM its decision to partially deny RGI s Rule 50(b) motion and its decision to not instruct the jury on Sabatine s illegal conduct; DENY RGI s motion for a new trial; and REMAND the case with instructions to reinstate the jury verdict and calculate the interest owed on the judgment. Decision for publication. Richard Allen Griffin and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges; and Robert H. Cleland (AUTHORING), U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. [14-3753, 14-3832]

Download PDF
Case: 14-3753 Document: 39-1 Filed: 04/22/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: April 22, 2016 Mr. David A. Kutik Jones Day 901 Lakeside Avenue, E. Cleveland, OH 44114 Mr. David E. Mills The Mills Law Office 1300 W. Ninth Street, Suite 636 Cleveland, OH 44113 Mr. Michael B. Pasternak 3681 S. Green Road, Suite 411 Beachwood, OH 44122 Mr. Chad A. Readler Jones Day 325 John H. McConnell Boulevard, Suite 600 Columbus, OH 43215 Mr. Jonathon Mead Yarger Yarger Radel & Pentz 1111 Superior Avenue, Suite 530 Cleveland, OH 44114 Re: Case Nos. 14-3753/14-3832, Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc. Originating Case No. : 4:04-cv-01817 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled cases. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Case: 14-3753 Document: 39-1 Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Ms. Geri M. Smith Enclosures Mandate to issue. Filed: 04/22/2016 Page: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?