Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : We REVERSE the trial court s standing determination; AFFIRM its decision to partially deny RGI s Rule 50(b) motion and its decision to not instruct the jury on Sabatine s illegal conduct; DENY RGI s motion for a new trial; and REMAND the case with instructions to reinstate the jury verdict and calculate the interest owed on the judgment. Decision for publication. Richard Allen Griffin and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges; and Robert H. Cleland (AUTHORING), U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. [14-3753, 14-3832]
Case: 14-3753
Document: 39-1
Filed: 04/22/2016
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: April 22, 2016
Mr. David A. Kutik
Jones Day
901 Lakeside Avenue, E.
Cleveland, OH 44114
Mr. David E. Mills
The Mills Law Office
1300 W. Ninth Street, Suite 636
Cleveland, OH 44113
Mr. Michael B. Pasternak
3681 S. Green Road, Suite 411
Beachwood, OH 44122
Mr. Chad A. Readler
Jones Day
325 John H. McConnell Boulevard, Suite 600
Columbus, OH 43215
Mr. Jonathon Mead Yarger
Yarger Radel & Pentz
1111 Superior Avenue, Suite 530
Cleveland, OH 44114
Re: Case Nos. 14-3753/14-3832, Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.
Originating Case No. : 4:04-cv-01817
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled cases.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Case: 14-3753
Document: 39-1
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Ms. Geri M. Smith
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.
Filed: 04/22/2016
Page: 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?