Carla Theiss v. Walgreen Company


OPINION filed : We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court with respect to the dismissal of Theiss s claims of interference and retaliation under the FMLA. We REMAND the question of the district court s jurisdiction over the attendant state claims for proceedings consistent with this opinion, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs and Alice M. Batchelder (Authoring), Circuit Judges; and Paul C. Huck, District Judge, FLSD. [14-3892, 14-3933]

Download PDF
Case: 14-3892 Document: 31-2 Filed: 12/07/2015 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: December 07, 2015 Ms. Neema M. Bell Mr. Gregory T. Lodge Mr. Thomas A. Sobecki Re: Case No. 14-3892/14-3933, Carla Theiss v. Walgreen Company Originating Case No. : 3:12-cv-02294 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in these cases. Sincerely yours, s/Beverly L. Harris Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7077 cc: Ms. Geri M. Smith Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?