Berry Meadows, et al v. James Enyeart, et al
Filing
OPINION filed : The district court s holding that threatening private legal action can be the basis of a 1983 claim is REVERSED and the district court s denial of qualified immunity is REVERSED, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs (AUTHORING) and Karen Nelson Moore (DISSENTING in part), Circuit Judges; Danny C. Reeves, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
Case: 14-4001
Document: 35-1
Filed: 10/01/2015
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: October 1, 2015
Mr. Gregory A. Beck
Baker, Dublikar, Beck, Wiley & Mathews
400 S. Main Street
North Canton, OH 44720
Mr. David Lee Engler
Law Office
725 Boardman-Canfield Road
Suite S3
Youngstown, OH 44512
Re: Case No. 14-4001, Berry Meadows, et al v. James Enyeart, et al
Originating Case No. : 4:12-cv-02279
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Jeanine R. Hance
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7037
cc: Mr. Stephen Bruce Doucette
Mr. William Henry Kotar
Mr. Thomas John Lipka
Ms. Geri M. Smith
Enclosure
Mandate to issue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?