Berry Meadows, et al v. James Enyeart, et al


OPINION filed : The district court s holding that threatening private legal action can be the basis of a 1983 claim is REVERSED and the district court s denial of qualified immunity is REVERSED, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs (AUTHORING) and Karen Nelson Moore (DISSENTING in part), Circuit Judges; Danny C. Reeves, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 14-4001 Document: 35-1 Filed: 10/01/2015 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: October 1, 2015 Mr. Gregory A. Beck Baker, Dublikar, Beck, Wiley & Mathews 400 S. Main Street North Canton, OH 44720 Mr. David Lee Engler Law Office 725 Boardman-Canfield Road Suite S3 Youngstown, OH 44512 Re: Case No. 14-4001, Berry Meadows, et al v. James Enyeart, et al Originating Case No. : 4:12-cv-02279 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Jeanine R. Hance Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7037 cc: Mr. Stephen Bruce Doucette Mr. William Henry Kotar Mr. Thomas John Lipka Ms. Geri M. Smith Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?