USA v. Antoinne Goodloe


Per Curiam OPINION filed : AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Jeffrey S. Sutton and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 14-5627 Document: 20-2 Filed: 04/14/2015 Page: 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 15a0275n.06 FILED Case No. 14-5627 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTOINNE GOODLOE, Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Apr 14, 2015 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BEFORE: NORRIS, SUTTON, and DONALD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In 2008, Antoinne Goodloe pleaded guilty to a crack-related offense. See 21 U.S.C. § 846. He received a 121-month sentence, one month above the then-applicable mandatory minimum. After the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 lowered that minimum to sixty months, Goodloe moved for a sentence reduction. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court obliged him one month, but refused to apply the new minimum retroactively. That refusal, Goodloe now argues, violates both the Act and the Constitution. But United States v. Blewett, 746 F.3d 647, 650 (6th Cir. 2013) (en banc), holds otherwise. Because the old minimum still applies to his case, Goodloe received the maximum reduction the law permits. For these reasons, we affirm.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?