USA v. Antoinne Goodloe
Per Curiam OPINION filed : AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Jeffrey S. Sutton and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 15a0275n.06
Case No. 14-5627
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Apr 14, 2015
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
BEFORE: NORRIS, SUTTON, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. In 2008, Antoinne Goodloe pleaded guilty to a crack-related offense.
See 21 U.S.C. § 846. He received a 121-month sentence, one month above the then-applicable
mandatory minimum. After the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 lowered that minimum to sixty
months, Goodloe moved for a sentence reduction. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court
obliged him one month, but refused to apply the new minimum retroactively. That refusal,
Goodloe now argues, violates both the Act and the Constitution. But United States v. Blewett,
746 F.3d 647, 650 (6th Cir. 2013) (en banc), holds otherwise. Because the old minimum still
applies to his case, Goodloe received the maximum reduction the law permits.
For these reasons, we affirm.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?