USA v. Jason Brown
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s revocation of Defendant s supervised release is AFFIRMED, Defendant s convictions at trial are VACATED based on the Speedy Trial Act violation, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for a determination as to whether the indictment should be dismissed with or without prejudice based on the factors enumerated under 18 U.S.C. 3162(a)(2). decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore, Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING), and Ronald Lee Gilman (CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART), Circuit Judges. [14-6543, 14-6544]
Case: 14-6543
Document: 41-3
Filed: 03/24/2016
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Nos. 14-6543/6544
FILED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
Mar 24, 2016
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
v.
JASON CURTIS BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Before: MOORE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern Kentucky of Michigan at Ashland.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s revocation of
Defendant’s supervised release is AFFIRMED, Defendant’s convictions at trial are VACATED based
on the Speedy Trial Act violation, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for a determination
as to whether the indictment should be dismissed with or without prejudice based on the factors
enumerated under 18 U.S.C. § 3162(a)(2).
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?