USA v. Jason Brown

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s revocation of Defendant s supervised release is AFFIRMED, Defendant s convictions at trial are VACATED based on the Speedy Trial Act violation, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for a determination as to whether the indictment should be dismissed with or without prejudice based on the factors enumerated under 18 U.S.C. 3162(a)(2). decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore, Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING), and Ronald Lee Gilman (CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART), Circuit Judges. [14-6543, 14-6544]

Download PDF
Case: 14-6543 Document: 41-3 Filed: 03/24/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Nos. 14-6543/6544 FILED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, Mar 24, 2016 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. JASON CURTIS BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. Before: MOORE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Kentucky of Michigan at Ashland. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s revocation of Defendant’s supervised release is AFFIRMED, Defendant’s convictions at trial are VACATED based on the Speedy Trial Act violation, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for a determination as to whether the indictment should be dismissed with or without prejudice based on the factors enumerated under 18 U.S.C. § 3162(a)(2). ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?