Sheet Metal Employers Industry, et al v. Absolut Balancing Co., Inc., et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s order denying the parties cross-motions for summary judgment is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration of the Employer s obligations under the Local 80 Collective Bargaining Agreement in light of federal labor law. Decision for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Richard Allen Griffin,and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.
Case: 15-1682
Document: 40-3
Filed: 07/18/2016
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1682
SHEET METAL EMPLOYERS INDUSTRY PROMOTION
FUND; SHEET METAL EMPLOYERS INDUSTRY
APPRENTICESHIP REIMBURSEMENT FUND,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
FILED
Jul 18, 2016
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
v.
ABSOLUT BALANCING CO., INC.; ENVIRO-AIRE/TOTAL
BALANCE CO., INC.; AERODYNAMICS INSPECTING CO.;
AIRFLOW TESTING, INC.; BARMATIC INSPECTING CO.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: GIBBONS, GRIFFIN, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s order denying the
parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for
reconsideration of the Employer’s obligations under the Local 80 Collective Bargaining Agreement in
light of federal labor law.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?