Sheet Metal Employers Industry, et al v. Absolut Balancing Co., Inc., et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s order denying the parties cross-motions for summary judgment is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration of the Employer s obligations under the Local 80 Collective Bargaining Agreement in light of federal labor law. Decision for publication. Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Richard Allen Griffin,and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 15-1682 Document: 40-3 Filed: 07/18/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1682 SHEET METAL EMPLOYERS INDUSTRY PROMOTION FUND; SHEET METAL EMPLOYERS INDUSTRY APPRENTICESHIP REIMBURSEMENT FUND, Plaintiffs - Appellants, FILED Jul 18, 2016 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. ABSOLUT BALANCING CO., INC.; ENVIRO-AIRE/TOTAL BALANCE CO., INC.; AERODYNAMICS INSPECTING CO.; AIRFLOW TESTING, INC.; BARMATIC INSPECTING CO., Defendants - Appellees. Before: GIBBONS, GRIFFIN, and DONALD, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s order denying the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration of the Employer’s obligations under the Local 80 Collective Bargaining Agreement in light of federal labor law. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?