David Smith v. LexisNexis Screening Solution

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court is REVERSED regarding willfulness and punitive damages, and is AFFIRMED on all other grounds. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is REMANDED for entry of an order consistent with the opinion of this court. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr., John M. Rogers (AUTHORING), and Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judges. [15-2329, 15-2330]

Download PDF
Case: 15-2329 Document: 41-1 Filed: 09/13/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: September 13, 2016 Mr. Alan Jay Butler Electronic Privacy Information Center 1718 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 200 Washington, DC 20009 Mr. James A. Francis Francis & Mailman 100 S. Broad Street, 19th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19110 Ms. Kara L. Goodwin Mr. Thomas J. Piskorski Seyfarth Shaw 131 S. Dearborn Street, Suite 2400 Chicago, IL 60603 Mr. Ian B. Lyngklip 24500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 206 Southfield, MI 48075 Mr. Frederick Thomas Smith Seyfarth Shaw 1075 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2500 Atlanta, GA 30309 Mr. John Soumilas Francis & Mailman 100 S. Broad Street, 19th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19110 Re: Case Nos. 15-2329/2330, Smith v. LexisNexis Screening Solutions Originating Case No. : 4:13-cv-10774 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled cases. Case: 15-2329 Document: 41-1 Filed: 09/13/2016 Page: 2 Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?