State of TN v. FCC, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The petitions for review are GRANTED, and the Federal Trade Commission s order is REVERSED. Decision for publication. John M. Rogers (AUTHORING) and Helene N. White (CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART), Circuit Judges; and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. [15-3291, 15-3555]

Case: 15-3291

Document: 112-3

Filed: 08/10/2016

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Nos. 15-3291/3555
STATE OF TENNESSEE (15-3291);
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA (15-3555),
Petitioners,

FILED

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY
UTILITY COMMISSIONERS,
Intervenor,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION;
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA,
Respondents,

Aug 10, 2016
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

ELECTRIC POW ER BOARD OF CHATTANOOGA;
CITY OF W ILSON, N.C.,
Intervenors.
Respondent - Appellee.
Before: ROGERS and W HITE, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.
JUDGM ENT
On Petitions for Review of an Order
of the Federal Communications Commission.
THIS MATTER came before the court upon petitions by the State of Tennessee and the State of North
Carolina for review of a decision by the Federal Communications Commission.
UPON FULL REVIEW of the record and the briefs and arguments of counsel,
IT IS ORDERED that the petitions for review are GRANTED, and the Federal Trade Commission’s order
is REVERSED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk