State of TN v. FCC, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The petitions for review are GRANTED, and the Federal Trade Commission s order is REVERSED. Decision for publication. John M. Rogers (AUTHORING) and Helene N. White (CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART), Circuit Judges; and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation. [15-3291, 15-3555]

Download PDF
Case: 15-3291 Document: 112-3 Filed: 08/10/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Nos. 15-3291/3555 STATE OF TENNESSEE (15-3291); STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA (15-3555), Petitioners, FILED NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, Intervenor, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, Respondents, Aug 10, 2016 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ELECTRIC POW ER BOARD OF CHATTANOOGA; CITY OF W ILSON, N.C., Intervenors. Respondent - Appellee. Before: ROGERS and W HITE, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge. JUDGM ENT On Petitions for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission. THIS MATTER came before the court upon petitions by the State of Tennessee and the State of North Carolina for review of a decision by the Federal Communications Commission. UPON FULL REVIEW of the record and the briefs and arguments of counsel, IT IS ORDERED that the petitions for review are GRANTED, and the Federal Trade Commission’s order is REVERSED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?