Konecranes, Inc. v. Central Motor Wheel America

Filing

OPINION filed: For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the district court granting summary judgment to Konecranes on its contractual indemnity claim against Central Motor Wheel is hereby AFFIRMED. Decision not for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, (AUTHORING), Julia Smith Gibbons and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges.

Case: 15-5690

Document: 23-1

Filed: 03/01/2016

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: March 01, 2016
Mr. Licha H. Farah Jr.
Ward, Hocker & Thornton
333 W. Vine Street
Suite 1100
Lexington, KY 40507
Ms. Jane C. Higgins
Law Offices
163 E. Main Street
Suite 130
Lexington, KY 40507
Re:

Case No. 15-5690, Konecranes, Inc. v. Central Motor Wheel of
America
Originating Case No. : 5:14-cv-00136

Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Amy E. Gigliotti
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012
cc: Mr. Robert R. Carr
Enclosure
Mandate to issue