Konecranes, Inc. v. Central Motor Wheel America


OPINION filed: For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the district court granting summary judgment to Konecranes on its contractual indemnity claim against Central Motor Wheel is hereby AFFIRMED. Decision not for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt, (AUTHORING), Julia Smith Gibbons and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 15-5690 Document: 23-1 Filed: 03/01/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: March 01, 2016 Mr. Licha H. Farah Jr. Ward, Hocker & Thornton 333 W. Vine Street Suite 1100 Lexington, KY 40507 Ms. Jane C. Higgins Law Offices 163 E. Main Street Suite 130 Lexington, KY 40507 Re: Case No. 15-5690, Konecranes, Inc. v. Central Motor Wheel of America Originating Case No. : 5:14-cv-00136 Dear Counsel: The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Amy E. Gigliotti Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012 cc: Mr. Robert R. Carr Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?