John Treadway v. California Products Corp


OPINION filed : Whether some CPC executives with the exception of Booker treated Treadway unfairly may be a legitimate question on this record. Treadway, however, alleges employment discrimination based on his age. Because Treadway did not provide evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether CPC s business rationale for terminating him was a pretext for age discrimination, we AFFIRM the district court s grant of summary judgment, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judges; and Terrence George Berg (Authoring), District Judge.

Download PDF
Case: 15-5718 Document: 41-2 Filed: 08/01/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: August 01, 2016 Mr. Matthew Dale Davison Mr. Charlton Ross DeVault Jr. Mr. Arthur Gershon Telegen Ms. Lauren S. Wachsman Mr. Erik W. Weibust Re: Case No. 15-5718, John Treadway v. California Products Corp Originating Case No. : 2:13-cv-00120 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Beverly L. Harris Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7077 cc: Ms. Debra Poplin Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?