Christina Saunders v. P&G Health and Long-Term Di

Filing

OPINION filed: Because Saunders has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that she is totally disabled as defined by the Plan, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court, decision not for publication. Alice M. Batchelder (authoring), Circuit Judge; Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judge and Judith E. Levy, District Judge (Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation).

Case: 16-3043

Document: 30-1

Filed: 08/23/2016

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: August 23, 2016

Mr. Tony C. Merry
Law Offices of Tony C. Merry
7100 N. High Street
Suite 302
Worthington, OH 43085
Mr. Jack Fredrick Fuchs
Thompson Hine
312 Walnut Street
14th Floor
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Re: Case No. 16-3043, Christina Saunders v. P&G Health and Long-Term Dis
Originating Case No. : 1:15-cv-00154
Dear Counsel:
The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case.
Sincerely yours,
s/Renee M. Jefferies
Case Manager
Direct Dial No. 513-564-7021
cc: Mr. Richard W. Nagel
Enclosure
Mandate to issue