Joseph Privett v. Secretary, DHS, et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s grant of defendants motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction with regard to the question of whether Joseph Privett was subject to the Adam Walsh Act is REVERSED, its dismissal of the other claims for want of jurisdiction is AFFIRMED, and the case is REMANDED for further fact-finding to determine whether the underlying conviction did indeed involve a minor. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole, Jr., Chief Judge (CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART); Danny J. Boggs (AUTHORING) and Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Circuit Judges.
Case: 16-3243
Document: 25-1
Filed: 07/26/2017
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Tel. (513) 564-7000
www.ca6.uscourts.gov
Filed: July 26, 2017
Ms. Yamileth G. Davila
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Immigration Litigation, P.O. Box 878
Washington, DC 20044
Mr. William Bryan King II
Office of the U.S. Attorney 221 E. Fourth Street, Suite 400
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Mr. Nicklaus Misiti
40 Wall Street, 28th Floor
New York, NY 10005
Re: Case No. 16-3243, Joseph Privett v. Secretary, DHS, et al
Originating Case No. : 1:14-cv-00714
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Mr. Richard W. Nagel
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?