United Automobile, Aerospace, et al v. Hardin County, Kentucky, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s judgment order invalidating the right-to-work protection of 4(B) of Hardin County Ordinance 300 is REVERSED. In all other respects, the court s judgment order, declaring 4(E) and 5 of Ordinance 300 unenforceable, is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Richard F. Suhrheinrich, and David W. McKeague (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 16-5246 Document: 46-3 Filed: 11/18/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 16-5246 UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 3047, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, FILED Nov 18, 2016 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. HARDIN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, et al., Defendants - Appellants. Before: BOGGS, SUHRHEINRICH, and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Louisville. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, and for the reasons more fully set forth in the court’s opinion of even date, it is ORDERED that the district court’s judgment order invalidating the right-to-work protection of § 4(B) of Hardin County Ordinance 300 is REVERSED. In all other respects, the court’s judgment order, declaring § 4(E) and § 5 of Ordinance 300 unenforceable, is AFFIRMED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT _____________________________________ Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?