In re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's January 26, 2017 preliminary injunction is VACATED. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole , Jr., Chief Judge; Alice M. Batchelder, Karen Nelson Moore (DISSENTING), Eric L. Clay, Julia Smith Gibbons, John M. Rogers, Jeffrey S. Sutton, David W. McKeague, Richard Allen Griffin, Raymond M. Kethledge, Helene N. White, Jane Branstetter Stranch (CONCURRING IN THE DISSENT), Bernice Bouie Donald, and Amul R. Thapar, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 17-3076 Document: 69-3 Filed: 06/28/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 17-3076 IN RE: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL. ___________________________________ FILED Jun 28, 2017 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ANGELO FEARS, et al., Plaintiffs, GARY OTTE; RONALD PHILLIPS; RAYMOND TIBBETTS, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. DONALD MORGAN, et al., Defendants - Appellants. Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, DONALD, and THAPAR, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Winchester. UPON CONSIDERATION of the petition for rehearing en banc and the supplemental briefs and arguments of counsel, IT IS ORDERED that the district court’s January 26, 2017 preliminary injunction is VACATED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?