Peggy S. LeGrande v. USA

Filing

ORDER: The court, on its own motion, amends the text of the original opinion issued on 07/18/2012. See LeGrande v. United States, No. 11-2205, 2012 WL 2913730 (7th Cir. July 18, 2012). The opinion is corrected as follows: The following sentence, appearing on page 26 of the slip opinion and at *9 of 2012 WL 2913730, should be removed: The Supreme Court has held that this requirement is jurisdictional and not subject to waiver. McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 112-13 (1993). Additionally, the sentence quoting McNeil, which appears on page 28 of the slip opinion and at *10 of 2012 WL 2913730, should be amended. It currently reads: As the Supreme Court noted in McNeil, the statutory threshold requirement of filing an administrative claim with the appropriate agency is clear and cannot be characterized as a trap for the unwary. 508 U.S. at 113. As amended it should read: As the Supreme Court noted in McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993), the statutory threshold requirement of filing an administrative claim with the appropriate agency is clear and cannot be characterized as a trap for the unwary. [6420141-3] [6420141] [11-2205]

Case: 11-2205

Document: 27

Filed: 08/14/2012

Pages: 2

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Argued October 26, 2011
Decided August 14, 2012

Before 
KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge
DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, District Judge*
No. 11‐2205
PEGGY S. LEGRANDE,

Appeal from the United States 
District Court for the Northern 
District of Illinois, Eastern Division. 

Plaintiff‐Appellant,
 v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

No. 1:08‐cv‐02047
Joan B. Gottschall, Judge.

Defendant‐Appellee.

O R D E R
The court, on its own motion, amends the text of the original opinion.  See
LeGrande v. United States, No. 11‐2205, 2012 WL 2913730 (7th Cir. July 18, 2012).  The
following sentence, appearing on page 26 of the slip opinion and at *9 of 2012 WL

* The Honorable Sue E. Myerscough of the Central District of Illinois, sitting
by designation.

Case: 11-2205

No. 11‐2205

Document: 27

Filed: 08/14/2012

Pages: 2

Page 2

2913730, should be removed:  “The Supreme Court has held that this requirement is
jurisdictional and not subject to waiver.  McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 112‐13
(1993).”  
Additionally, the sentence quoting McNeil, which appears on page 28 of the slip
opinion and at *10 of 2012 WL 2913730, should be amended.  It currently reads:  “As the
Supreme Court noted in McNeil, the statutory threshold requirement of filing an
administrative claim with the appropriate agency is clear and cannot be characterized
as a ‘trap for the unwary.’ 508 U.S. at 113.”  As amended it should read: “As the
Supreme Court noted in McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1993), the statutory
threshold requirement of filing an administrative claim with the appropriate agency is
clear and cannot be characterized as a ‘trap for the unwary.’”