Warnether Muhammad v. Caterpillar, Incorporated

Filing

ORDER: Appellant Warnether A. Muhammad Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. The opinion issued in the above-entitled case on September 9, 2014, is hereby amended as follows: On page 5: in the second full paragraph, the last sentence starting We are not persuaded ... is deleted; On pages 5-6: the last paragraph of page 5 (starting First, Muhammad s argument ... ) ending on page 6 is deleted. On page 6: the first sentence of the first full paragraph is modified so that Second, even if we set that problem aside, another more is replaced by A , so that the sentence reads A fundamental obstacle .... On page 8: the first full paragraph (starting The first problem is ... ) is deleted, and the first two sentences of the second full paragraph are deleted, such that the second full paragraph begins with Muhammad has not identified ... [6613364-1] [6613364] [12-1723]

Case: 12-1723

Document: 56

Filed: 10/16/2014

Pages: 2

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS  60604
October 16, 2014
Before
FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge
No. 12‐1723
WARNETHER A. MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff‐Appellant,
v.

Appeal from the United States District Court 
for the Central District of Illinois. 
No. 09‐cv‐2172

CATERPILLAR, INCORPORATED,
Defendant‐Appellee.

Michael P. McCuskey, Judge.

O R D E R
On consideration of the Petition For Panel Rehearing filed by Plaintiff‐Appellant
on October 7, 2014, all members of the original panel have voted to DENY the Petition
For Panel Rehearing.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition For Panel Rehearing is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion issued in the above‐entitled case on
September 9, 2014, is hereby amended as follows:
On page 5: in the second full paragraph, the last sentence
starting “We are not persuaded ...” is deleted; 

Case: 12-1723

Document: 56

Filed: 10/16/2014

Pages: 2

Appeal no. 12‐1723

          Page 2

On pages 5‐6: the last paragraph of page 5 (starting “First,
Muhammad’s argument ...”) ending on page 6 is deleted. 
On page 6: the first sentence of the first full paragraph is
modified so that “Second, even if we set that problem aside,
another more” is replaced by “A”, so that the sentence
reads “A fundamental obstacle ....”
On page 8: the first full paragraph (starting “The first
problem is ...”) is deleted, and the first two sentences of the
second full paragraph are deleted, such that the second full
paragraph begins with “Muhammad has not identified ...”

-2-