Citadel Securities LLC, et al v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, et al

Filing

ORDER re: Motion to correct typographical/transposition error in December 11, 2015 opinion. The motion to correct typographical error is GRANTED. On page 8 of the slip opinion, in the last sentence of the first full paragraph, the word "defendants'" is changed to "plaintiffs'." The full sentence shall read, "Thus, the logic of Weissman does not excuse plaintiffs' obligation to exhaust SEC remedies before bringing suit in federal district court." [6716438-2] [6717134-1] [6717134] [14-2912, 14-3071]

Download PDF
Case: 14-2912 Document: 55 Filed: 12/23/2015 Pages: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Office of the Clerk Phone: (312) 435-5850 www.ca7.uscourts.gov ORDER December 23, 2015 Before JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge CITADEL SECURITIES LLC, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants Nos. 14-2912 and 14-3071 v. CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants - Appellees Originating Case Information: District Court No: 1:13-cv-05833 Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division District Judge Robert W. Gettleman Upon consideration of the DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES’ MOTION TO CORRECT TYPOGRAPHICAL/TRANSPOSITION ERROR IN DECEMBER 11, 2015 OPINION, filed on December 21, 2015, by counsel for the defendant Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., IT IS ORDERED that the motion to correct typographical error is GRANTED. On page 8 of the slip opinion, in the last sentence of the first full paragraph, the word "defendants'" is changed to "plaintiffs'." The full sentence shall read, "Thus, the logic of Weissman does not excuse plaintiffs' obligation to exhaust SEC remedies before bringing suit in federal district court." form name: c7_Order_3J(form ID: 177)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?