Citadel Securities LLC, et al v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, et al
Filing
ORDER re: Motion to correct typographical/transposition error in December 11, 2015 opinion. The motion to correct typographical error is GRANTED. On page 8 of the slip opinion, in the last sentence of the first full paragraph, the word "defendants'" is changed to "plaintiffs'." The full sentence shall read, "Thus, the logic of Weissman does not excuse plaintiffs' obligation to exhaust SEC remedies before bringing suit in federal district court." [6716438-2] [6717134-1] [6717134] [14-2912, 14-3071]
Case: 14-2912
Document: 55
Filed: 12/23/2015
Pages: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse
Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Office of the Clerk
Phone: (312) 435-5850
www.ca7.uscourts.gov
ORDER
December 23, 2015
Before
JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge
CITADEL SECURITIES LLC, et al.,
Plaintiffs - Appellants
Nos. 14-2912 and 14-3071
v.
CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED, et al.,
Defendants - Appellees
Originating Case Information:
District Court No: 1:13-cv-05833
Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
District Judge Robert W. Gettleman
Upon consideration of the DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES’ MOTION TO CORRECT
TYPOGRAPHICAL/TRANSPOSITION ERROR IN DECEMBER 11, 2015 OPINION, filed on
December 21, 2015, by counsel for the defendant Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to correct typographical error is GRANTED. On page
8 of the slip opinion, in the last sentence of the first full paragraph, the word "defendants'" is
changed to "plaintiffs'." The full sentence shall read, "Thus, the logic of Weissman does not
excuse plaintiffs' obligation to exhaust SEC remedies before bringing suit in federal district
court."
form name: c7_Order_3J(form ID: 177)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?