USA v. Deandre Armour

Filing

ORDER re: Motion Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651 And/Or Rule 60(a) of Civil Procedure to Correct A Clerical Mistake. Duryea Rogers moves to amend our opinion in the appeal of his co-defendant, Deandre Armour. United States v. Armour, No. 15-2170. Rogers explains that the opinion incorrectly states that he testified against Armour, and he asks us to correct the opinion to reflect that he did not cooperate with the government. The government responds that it does not object to the change. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the opinion is AMENDED as follows: In the last paragraph on page 2, the sentence that reads "Both testified against Armour, who went to trial" shall be replaced with the sentence "Hardy testified against Armour, who went to trial." [6845025-2] [6850063-1] [6850063] [15-2170]

Download PDF
Case: 15-2170 Document: 49 Filed: 06/26/2017 Pages: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60604 Office of the Clerk Phone: (312) 435-5850 www.ca7.uscourts.gov ORDER June 26, 2017 Before ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee No. 15-2170 v. DEANDRE ARMOUR, Defendant - Appellant Originating Case Information: District Court No: 1:13-cr-00159-SEB-DKL-1 Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division District Judge Sarah Evans Barker The following is before the court: MOTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 AND/OR RULE 60(a) OF CIVIL PROCEDURE TO CORRECT A CLERICAL MISTAKE, filed on May 30, 2017, by pro se Appellant. Duryea Rogers moves to amend our opinion in the appeal of his co-defendant, Deandre Armour. United States v. Armour, No. 15-2170. Rogers explains that the opinion incorrectly states that he testified against Armour, and he asks us to correct the opinion to reflect that he did not cooperate with the government. The government responds that it does not object to the change. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the opinion is AMENDED as follows: In the last paragraph on page 2, the sentence that reads "Both testified against Armour, who went to trial" shall be replaced with the sentence "Hardy testified against Armour, who went to trial." form name: c7_Order_3J(form ID: 177)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?