USA v. Deandre Armour
Filing
ORDER re: Motion Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651 And/Or Rule 60(a) of Civil Procedure to Correct A Clerical Mistake. Duryea Rogers moves to amend our opinion in the appeal of his co-defendant, Deandre Armour. United States v. Armour, No. 15-2170. Rogers explains that the opinion incorrectly states that he testified against Armour, and he asks us to correct the opinion to reflect that he did not cooperate with the government. The government responds that it does not object to the change. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the opinion is AMENDED as follows: In the last paragraph on page 2, the sentence that reads "Both testified against Armour, who went to trial" shall be replaced with the sentence "Hardy testified against Armour, who went to trial." [6845025-2] [6850063-1] [6850063] [15-2170]
Case: 15-2170
Document: 49
Filed: 06/26/2017
Pages: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse
Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Office of the Clerk
Phone: (312) 435-5850
www.ca7.uscourts.gov
ORDER
June 26, 2017
Before
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee
No. 15-2170
v.
DEANDRE ARMOUR,
Defendant - Appellant
Originating Case Information:
District Court No: 1:13-cr-00159-SEB-DKL-1
Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division
District Judge Sarah Evans Barker
The following is before the court: MOTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 AND/OR RULE
60(a) OF CIVIL PROCEDURE TO CORRECT A CLERICAL MISTAKE, filed on May 30, 2017,
by pro se Appellant.
Duryea Rogers moves to amend our opinion in the appeal of his co-defendant, Deandre
Armour. United States v. Armour, No. 15-2170. Rogers explains that the opinion incorrectly
states that he testified against Armour, and he asks us to correct the opinion to reflect that he
did not cooperate with the government. The government responds that it does not object to the
change. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that the opinion is AMENDED as follows:
In the last paragraph on page 2, the sentence that reads "Both testified against Armour, who
went to trial" shall be replaced with the sentence "Hardy testified against Armour, who
went to trial."
form name: c7_Order_3J(form ID: 177)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?