Selective Insurance Company of v. Target Corporation, et al

Filing

ORDER: The opinion of this Court issued on 12/29/2016 is amended as follows: On page 4, at lines 23 and 28, the year 2001 is replaced with 2007, such that the date referenced in both lines is April 2007. On page 7, at line 26, the word eight is replaced with two, such that the sentence reads as follows: One of those future agreements was the Program Agreement executed by Target and Harbor two years after the Supplier Agreement. On page 8, at line 6 of footnote 1, the word eight is re-placed with two, such that the sentence reads as follows: Selective s position ignores the reality that the two con-tracts were executed two years apart and were not one con-tract. [6814165-1] [6814165] [16-1669]

Case: 16-1669

Document: 43

Filed: 01/25/2017

Pages: 2

In the

United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
____________________ 
No. 16‐1669 
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 
Plaintiff‐Appellant, 
v. 
TARGET CORPORATION, 
Defendant‐Appellee. 
____________________ 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the 
Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. 
No. 13‐cv‐5910 — Elaine E. Bucklo, District Judge. 

____________________ 

January 25, 2017 
Before  FLAUM  and  KANNE,  Circuit  Judges,  and  MAGNUS‐
STINSON, District Judge. 
ORDER 
The opinion issued in the above‐entitled case on Decem‐
ber 29, 2016, is hereby amended as follows: 

 Of the Southern District of Indiana, sitting by designation.  

Case: 16-1669

Document: 43

2 

Filed: 01/25/2017

Pages: 2

No. 16‐1669 

On page 4, at lines 23 and 28, the year “2001”1 is replaced 
with  “2007,”  such  that  the  date  referenced  in  both  lines  is 
“April 2007.” 
On  page  7,  at  line  26,  the  word  “eight”  is  replaced  with 
“two,” such that the sentence reads as follows: “One of those 
future agreements was the Program Agreement executed by 
Target and Harbor two years after the Supplier Agreement.” 
On page 8, at line 6 of footnote 1, the word “eight” is re‐
placed  with  “two,”  such  that  the  sentence  reads  as  follows: 
“Selective’s position ignores the reality that the two contracts 
were executed two years apart and were not one contract.” 

1 The erroneous date included in the previously‐issued opinion was taken 

from the photocopied first page of the Supplier Agreement, which appears 
to reference April 2001. See Appellant’s Supplemental Appendix at A50.