Terence S. Chancellor v. Select Portfolio Servicing, et al
Filing
Filed opinion of the court by Judge Posner. The judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for a factual inquiry into the parties' disagreement. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge; Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge and Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge. [6855271-1] [6855271] [16-2475]
Case: 16-2475
Document: 42
Filed: 07/19/2017
Pages: 2
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
____________________
No. 16-2475
TERENCE S. CHANCELLOR,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING and JPMORGAN CHASE
BANK, N.A.,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
No. 14 C 7712 — Sharon Johnson Coleman, Judge.
____________________
SUBMITTED JULY 5, 2017 — DECIDED JULY 19, 2017
____________________
Before POSNER, KANNE, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff reached an oral agreement to settle a litigation arising out of a home mortgage
loan to him, but the defendants insisted that as part of the
settlement he would have to release any claims he had
against another bank, and also a trust company, neither of
which had been a party to the litigation. Although the district judge agreed with the defendants’ position, it hasn’t
been proved that anyone had told the plaintiff during the
Case: 16-2475
2
Document: 42
Filed: 07/19/2017
Pages: 2
No. 16-2475
settlement conference that by agreeing to the settlement he
would also be releasing any claim he might have against the
two nonparties to the litigation. Because there was no evidentiary proceeding, there was no basis for the judge’s deciding that the plaintiff had agreed to release the claims
against the nonparties. The judgment must therefore be vacated and the case remanded for a factual inquiry into the
parties’ disagreement.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?