USA v. Vincent Jones

Filing

ORDER: The opinion issued on June 28, 2017, in connection with the above-referenced case, is AMENDED as follows: Page 6, first paragraph under the heading Discussion, line 5: the word in should be inserted after the word wrong. Page 10, footnote 1, is completely replaced with the following language: For purposes of argument, we will assume that the gun safes were closed, and thus the officers could not have observed the guns in plain view. [6851650-1] [6851650] [16-4254]

Download PDF
Case: 16-4254 Document: 34 Filed: 06/30/2017 Pages: 1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 30, 2017 Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge No. 16-4254 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. v. No. 3:15-cr-00048-JD-MGG-1 VINCENT JONES, Defendant-Appellant. Jon E. DeGuilio, Judge. ORDER The opinion issued on June 28, 2017, in connection with the above-referenced case, is AMENDED as follows: Page 6, first paragraph under the heading Discussion, line 5: the word “in” should be inserted after the word “wrong.” Page 10, footnote 1, is completely replaced with the following language: “For purposes of argument, we will assume that the gun safes were closed, and thus the officers could not have observed the guns in plain view.”

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?