USA v. Vincent Jones
Filing
ORDER: The opinion issued on June 28, 2017, in connection with the above-referenced case, is AMENDED as follows: Page 6, first paragraph under the heading Discussion, line 5: the word in should be inserted after the word wrong. Page 10, footnote 1, is completely replaced with the following language: For purposes of argument, we will assume that the gun safes were closed, and thus the officers could not have observed the guns in plain view. [6851650-1] [6851650] [16-4254]
Case: 16-4254
Document: 34
Filed: 06/30/2017
Pages: 1
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
June 30, 2017
Before
WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge
JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge
MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
No. 16-4254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
Appeal from the United States
District Court for the Northern District of
Indiana, South Bend Division.
v.
No. 3:15-cr-00048-JD-MGG-1
VINCENT JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
Jon E. DeGuilio,
Judge.
ORDER
The opinion issued on June 28, 2017, in connection with the above-referenced case, is
AMENDED as follows:
Page 6, first paragraph under the heading Discussion, line 5: the word “in” should be
inserted after the word “wrong.”
Page 10, footnote 1, is completely replaced with the following language: “For purposes of
argument, we will assume that the gun safes were closed, and thus the officers could not
have observed the guns in plain view.”
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?