Planned Parenthood Minnesota, et al v. Mike Rounds, et al

Filing

OPINION FILED - THE COURT: WILLIAM JAY RILEY, ROGER L. WOLLMAN, JAMES B. LOKEN, DIANA E. MURPHY, KERMIT E. BYE, MICHAEL J. MELLOY, LAVENSKI R. SMITH, STEVEN M. COLLOTON, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, DUANE BENTON and BOBBY E. SHEPHERD. Raymond W. Gruender, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED), CONCUR BY: JAMES B. LOKEN and CONCUR IN PART AND CONCUR IN THE JUDGMENT BY: STEVEN M. COLLOTON, DISSENT BY: DIANA E. MURPHY, JOINED BY: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, KERMIT E. BYE and MICHAEL J. MELLOY [3934935] [09-3231, 09-3233, 09-3362]

Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse 111 South 10th Street, Room 24.329 St. Louis, Missouri 63102 VOICE (314) 244-2400 FAX (314) 244-2780 www.ca8.uscourts.gov Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court July 24, 2012 Mr. John P. Guhin ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE 1302 E. Highway 14 Suite 1 Pierre, SD 57501-8501 RE: 09-3231 Planned Parenthood Minnesota, et al v. Mike Rounds, et al 09-3233 Planned Parenthood Minnesota, et al v. Alpha Center, et al 09-3362 Planned Parenthood Minnesota, et al v. Mike Rounds, et al Dear Counsel: The en banc court has issued an opinion in this case. Judgment has been entered in accordance with the opinion. The opinion will be released to the public at 10:00a.m. today. Please hold the opinion in confidence until that time. Michael E. Gans Clerk of Court SRD Enclosure(s) cc: Mr. Steven H. Aden Ms. Patricia Archer Mr. Stephen Dolan Bell Mr. Timothy E. Branson Mr. Harold J. Cassidy Mr. Michael R. Drysdale Mr. Roger Evans Mr. Joseph A. Haas Mr. Lawrence John Joseph Ms. Helene T. Krasnoff Ms. Mimi Liu Ms. Kimberly A. Parker Ms. Bobbi Rank Mr. Andrew Layton Schlafly Ms. Mailee R. Smith District Court/Agency Case Number(s): 4:05-cv-04077-KES Appellate Case: 09-3231 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2012 Entry ID: 3934935

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?