Samuel Hernandez v. Railroad Retirement Board
PER CURIAM OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, STEVEN M. COLLOTON and RAYMOND W. GRUENDER (UNPUBLISHED)  [09-3761]
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Railroad Retirement Board,
* Petition for Review of
* an Order of the
* Railroad Retirement Board.
Submitted: June 2, 2010
Filed: June 7, 2010
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Samuel Hernandez petitions for review of the final decision of the Railroad
Retirement Board (Board) adopting the decision of the hearings officer that
Hernandez’s February 2008 annuity adjustment was properly calculated. Hernandez
has not pointed to any error in the Board’s adjustment calculation, and we find none.
See Worms v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 255 F.3d 502, 505 (8th Cir. 2001) (Board’s decision will
be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence, is not arbitrary, and has reasonable
basis in law). Hernandez’s arguments concerning earlier decisions and other issues
are beyond the scope of our review. See 45 U.S.C. § 355(f) (claimant may seek
review of final decision of Board after exhausting all administrative remedies within
Board). Accordingly, we affirm.
Appellate Case: 09-3761
Date Filed: 06/07/2010 Entry ID: 3671671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?