DeAngelo Thomas v. Alford Northern, et al
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________ No. 09-3799 ___________ DeAngelo Lamont Thomas, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Alford Northern; Gary Rusher; Ray * Hopper; Stephan Clark; Danny * [UNPUBLISHED] Kirkman; Jonathan Rice; Robert * Hooper; Missouri Department of * Corrections, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: June 22, 2010 Filed: June 30, 2010 ___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. In this pro se appeal, Missouri inmate DeAngelo Lamont Thomas challenges the district court's1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit alleging that the use of pepper spray on him amounted to excessive force. Having carefully reviewed the record de novo, see Nelson v. Shuffman, 603 F.3d 439, 445 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
(8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that the one-time use of pepper spray in these circumstances--Thomas was refusing orders to stop behavior that was deemed to present a security risk--did not violate the Eighth Amendment. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment, see 8th Cir. R. 47B; and we deny Thomas's petition for a writ of prohibition. ______________________________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?