Pete Wright v. State of Missouri, et al

Filing 920100916

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1217 ___________ Pete Wright, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Appellee, George Lombardi; Larry Crawford, Defendants, Arthur Wood; Dave Dormire; Jay Cassady, Appellees, Gary Rice, Defendant, Deborah Hardin-Vinson; Oscar Johnson; Stanley Chris Swicord; Alfred Garcia; Dr. Rex Hardman, Missouri Department of Corrections, Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. [UNPUBLISHED]

___________ Submitted: September 7, 2010 Filed: September 16, 2010 ___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Pete Wright appeals the district court's1 partial dismissal and partial adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se action alleging federal civil rights and state law tort claims. Following careful de novo review, we find that dismissal and summary judgment were appropriate for the reasons discussed in the district court's orders. See Wojewski v. Rapid City Reg'l Hosp., 450 F.3d 338, 342 (8th Cir. 2006) (de novo review of order granting summary judgment); Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Wright's pending motion. ______________________________

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-

1